I've been reading lots of folks lately writing to the effect that this whole read/write web world is not about the tools, it's about how we use them. I agree with that notion. Mostly.
In some of the conversations I've been having recently, I've been arguing that, at least at some level, the focus should be on the tools, for a couple of reasons. One, we need to have a handle on what the tools can do so that we can apply them to our particular teaching and learning situations. If I don't know how to publish to the web (or that it's completely safe for students to do so), then I can't consider it as a possibility in my classes. Further, if I don't know that most wikis won't allow for same-time multiple edits/editors, then I won't realize (until it's too late) that having everyone edit the same piece of text in class is just won't work.
The second reason is a little trickier, but was really brought home to me this week as I was involved in some training on a web-based gradebook.
This particular tool, the one that our district provides to teachers as an electronic gradebook, appears to require a letter grade as an output. What I mean is that, as it's currently configured, the only possible output for a student grade is a percentage tied to a letter. While we could tinker with what percentages resulted in what letter, that was all the tinkering that we could do. So this particular tool (certainly, not a read/write tool, but a technology tool nonetheless) only allows for a particular type of output. Not using letter grades is not an option with this tool. (I know - I've really, really stated that - but I think it's very important.)
While I'm not going to make a case right now for eliminating letter grades, I want to point out that, if my school system decided tomorrow to eliminate letter grading, we couldn't. Our computer system would not "allow" it.
Currently, many of our middle schools have assessment systems that are standards based and don't involve letter grades. The software that creates those is aging and might not be compatible with the new system. See the potential for a problem?
I'll end this post for fear of beginning to lose my point, which is this: Sometimes, it is about the tools, and about how those tools shape what is and is not "possible" in particular situations. The tools and their use (or misuse) can completely drive a classroom or management scenario. Pretending that it is never about the tools, and is only about the pedagogy or philosophy, is shortsighted and ultimately problematic.
Recent Comments